http://blog.ounodesign.com/2009/02/04/playing-with-tradition-rug-by-richard-hutton/ Curiouser and curiouser Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:08:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://blog.ounodesign.com/2009/02/04/playing-with-tradition-rug-by-richard-hutton/comment-page-1/#comment-140 Graphic Euphoria » Blog Archive » Awesome old school downloading rug! Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:49:12 +0000 http://blog.ounodesign.com/?p=2273#comment-140 [...] at Ouno Design. Spread me about [...] [...] at Ouno Design. Spread me about [...]

]]> http://blog.ounodesign.com/2009/02/04/playing-with-tradition-rug-by-richard-hutton/comment-page-1/#comment-138 admin Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:25:29 +0000 http://blog.ounodesign.com/?p=2273#comment-138 I think there may be no "up" so they must have felt free to hang it either way. It's interesting seeing it both ways. The rug definitely has the look of a pixel stretch but that's neat because either end is a traditional rug pattern - the typical persian rug at one end, a typical striped rug at the other. It's the join that creates the cognitive problem! I think there may be no “up” so they must have felt free to hang it either way. It’s interesting seeing it both ways. The rug definitely has the look of a pixel stretch but that’s neat because either end is a traditional rug pattern – the typical persian rug at one end, a typical striped rug at the other. It’s the join that creates the cognitive problem!

]]> http://blog.ounodesign.com/2009/02/04/playing-with-tradition-rug-by-richard-hutton/comment-page-1/#comment-139 Eva Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:21:35 +0000 http://blog.ounodesign.com/?p=2273#comment-139 I do wonder how traditional rug makers react on the first piece. -- On the small picture, it is visible hung up with the stripes on top; which way is right? It surprised me, too; first I did think it was a badly transferred picture. I do wonder how traditional rug makers react on the first piece. — On the small picture, it is visible hung up with the stripes on top; which way is right?
It surprised me, too; first I did think it was a badly transferred picture.

]]>